On August 29, 2026, the bankruptcy court approved Sheltering Arms Children and Family Services, Inc.’s sale of its Manhattan condominium units at 305 7th Avenue to Dr. Nand Panjwani for $2,509,500. The order also fixes SeaChange Capital Partners’ secured principal claim at $2 million, payable from sale proceeds, while treating its interest claim as general unsecured debt. The order was entered August 31; it authorizes closing but does not establish that the transaction has closed. Sale order, findings E–F and paragraphs 14 and 26.
The transaction advances the property dispositions contemplated when Sheltering Arms entered chapter 11 on March 7, 2024. Its first-day affidavit described a case intended to support the continued wind-down of its remaining business and disposition of its remaining real estate. First-day affidavit, paragraphs 1–4.
Sheltering Arms Children and Family Services, Inc.
Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York
Case Number
24-41037
Petition Date
March 7, 2024
Judge
Jil Mazer-Marino
Case Snapshot
The debtor’s bankruptcy announcement confirms the petition date, court and assigned judge; the sale order identifies the case number.
Manhattan sale provides for a $2 million secured payment
The court approved Panjwani’s offer for units 4A and 4B as the highest or best bid. Method Design Architecture and Urbanism PLLC submitted the approved backup bid. The order found that the debtor complied with the bidding procedures and that interested parties had a reasonable opportunity to bid. Sale order, findings C–G.
Term
Approved treatment
Winning purchaser and price
Dr. Nand Panjwani; $2,509,500
Backup bidder and price
Method Design Architecture and Urbanism PLLC; $2,484,500
SeaChange principal
$2,000,000 allowed secured claim, payable from sale proceeds
SeaChange interest
Accrued and unpaid interest, including additional interest through closing, treated as an allowed general unsecured claim
Other liens and encumbrances
Attach to net cash proceeds in their existing priority, subject to estate claims and defenses
The distinction between price and distributable cash matters. Subtracting the $2,000,000 secured principal payment from the $2,509,500 winning price leaves $509,500 before other deductions. This calculation uses the amounts fixed in the order; it does not account for transaction expenses, any payable break-up fee or other amounts chargeable against proceeds, and is not an estimate of unsecured creditor distributions. The order authorizes, but does not direct, payment of the backup bidder’s break-up fee from proceeds if the winning purchaser closes. Sale order, paragraphs 4 and 13–14.
The court found Panjwani to be a good-faith purchaser and authorized a free-and-clear transfer, with liens attaching to net cash proceeds. If the purchaser fails to close within 30 days after the order becomes final and unappealable, absent an agreed reasonable extension, the debtor may proceed with the backup bidder without another court order. The court also made the order immediately effective upon entry and permitted an immediate closing. Those provisions authorize implementation; they do not report its completion. Sale order, paragraphs 6, 9, 11 and 26.
Property borrowing preceded the wind-down
Sheltering Arms’ historical headquarters and several programs occupied three floors it owned at 305 7th Avenue. According to wind-down chief executive Judith Pincus, the organization subsequently relocated its headquarters and services, while pandemic-era construction delays and cost overruns eroded reserves. First-day affidavit, paragraphs 32–33.
The affidavit says sales of two commercial condominium floors generated separate cash infusions exceeding $6 million each, helping sustain operations. With reserves nearly exhausted, Sheltering Arms borrowed $1 million against the remaining floor around April 2022 and another $1 million around September 2022. Fiscal 2022 ended with a $7.6 million cash shortfall. These are the debtor’s historical financial representations, rather than a valuation comparison between the earlier properties and the units now approved for sale. First-day affidavit, paragraphs 36–38.
Government payment delays and reduced enrollment also contributed to the closure decision. CEO Elizabeth McCarthy told Gothamist in 2023 that late contract payments and low enrollment had undermined the organization, and that a $2 million budget gap had forced it to cut daycare programs the previous year. Sheltering Arms served more than 17,000 children and families through programs including youth shelters, foster care, mental health treatment and housing. Gothamist’s closure report.
The organization’s own announcement attributed its planned cessation to severe financial challenges resulting from the pandemic and said the majority of programs and employees would transfer to other agencies by July 1, 2023. It subsequently announced the March 2024 chapter 11 filing. Sheltering Arms announcement.
Tort claims complicate the remaining recovery question
In a May 13, 2026 motion, Sheltering Arms sought approval of a mandatory process to resolve tort claims and related cross-claims or indemnification claims. The debtor said it had been named in approximately 20 Child Victims Act lawsuits involving alleged misconduct from the 1960s through the 1990s. Some, it said, asserted successor-liability theories involving long-defunct social services agencies. These are allegations described by the debtor, not findings of liability. Claims-resolution motion, preliminary statement.
The debtor also reported that its search had located potential insurance coverage for approximately half of the overall cases. Potential coverage does not establish an insurer’s obligation to pay or the amount of a recovery. The motion documents a requested process, rather than an approved resolution or distribution. Claims-resolution motion, paragraph 1.
The sale evidence reviewed here extends through the August 31, 2026 entry of the Manhattan sale order; the tort discussion reflects the May 13 motion. The next transaction question is whether the approved sale closes and how much remains after the secured payment and other deductions. The $2,509,500 purchase price alone does not establish the amount available for creditor distributions. Sale order, paragraphs 9, 11 and 13–14.
Sources
Sale order, findings E–F and paragraphs 14 and 26 /documents/1433d868-1cd4-46e0-8c4a-f2c71eb5beda/
This article was researched and written with AI assistance, using court filings, public records, and news sources. AI-generated content can contain errors. Verify all information against primary sources before relying on it. This is not legal or financial advice. See the disclaimer.