Corporate Air: Pittsburgh FBO's 77-Day Chapter 11 Ends with Vantage-Sponsored Sale
Pittsburgh FBO Corporate Air completed a 77-day chapter 11 after losing Dick's Sporting Goods. Vantage AGC provided $4.5M DIP financing and acquired operations.
Corporate Air, LLC, a Pittsburgh-area fixed-base operator and aircraft charter provider with nearly four decades of history at Allegheny County Airport, emerged from chapter 11 bankruptcy in 77 days after losing a major corporate customer and facing threatened termination of its ground leases. The West Mifflin, Pennsylvania-based company—which at its peak operated long-range Gulfstream aircraft serving Fortune 500 clients—saw revenue decline between 2023 and 2025 after the departure of Dick's Sporting Goods as a managed aircraft customer, followed by the loss of two additional service contracts and the sale of assets including aircraft and hangar space.
When Allegheny County Airport threatened to terminate Corporate Air's ground leases in August 2025, prepetition bridge lender Vantage AGC, LLC provided $2 million to cure the default and preserve the company's airport presence. Vantage then funded a $4.5 million DIP facility to fund the chapter 11 process and served as plan sponsor for a going-concern reorganization that transferred substantially all assets to an FBO operator. The Confirmation Order, entered on December 15, 2025, approved a plan establishing a $500,000 distribution fund for general unsecured creditors while converting Vantage's DIP claims to equity in the reorganized enterprise. The filing occurred in 2025, a year that saw Spirit Airlines, Ravn Alaska, Verijet, and other carriers file for bankruptcy protection as operating costs rose, COVID-era debt burdens persisted, and competition intensified across the aviation sector.
| Court | U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Case Number | 25-22602 |
| Judge | Hon. Jeffery A. Deller |
| Petition Date | September 29, 2025 |
| Confirmation Date | December 15, 2025 |
| Plan Type | Going-Concern Reorganization |
| Debtor(s) | Corporate Air, LLC (7 jointly administered entities) |
| Estimated Assets | $1 million to $10 million |
| Estimated Liabilities | $10 million to $50 million |
| DIP Facility | $4.5 million (Vantage AGC, LLC) (interim draw: $1.5 million) |
| GUC Distribution Fund | $500,000 |
| Plan Sponsor | Vantage AGC, LLC |
| Lead Counsel | Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP / Babst Calland |
| CRO | Riveron Management Services, LLC |
| Claims Agent | Omni Agent Solutions, Inc. |
| Table: Case Snapshot |
Pittsburgh Aviation Services: Corporate Air's FBO Operations
Corporate Air was established in 1986 by Mark Schreiner at Allegheny County Airport (KAGC), a general aviation facility located approximately 10 miles southeast of downtown Pittsburgh in West Mifflin, Pennsylvania. The company began as a fixed-base operator providing fuel, hangar, and ground handling services to private and corporate aircraft. In 1999, Corporate Air expanded when it acquired the flight department of Westinghouse Electric, absorbing the industrial conglomerate's aircraft, crews, and management infrastructure into its operations.
This acquisition expanded Corporate Air from a fuel-and-hangar operation into an aviation services provider offering aircraft charter, management, and maintenance capabilities. The company operated and managed turboprop and jet aircraft on behalf of corporate owners that outsourced flight operations rather than maintaining in-house flight departments. Corporate Air's service portfolio included aircraft charter services for on-demand travel, aviation management contracts for corporate-owned aircraft, flight training through its Pittsburgh Flight Training Center subsidiary, and FBO amenities including fuel sales, hangar space, line service, and ground handling.
Corporate structure and debtor entities. The First Day Declaration described seven entities that reflected Corporate Air's aviation operations. Corporate Air, LLC served as the lead debtor and primary operating entity housing FBO and charter operations. Steel City Aviation, LLC and Steel City Aviation, Inc. held aviation operations and assets. Cheyenne, LLC functioned as an aircraft holding entity. Pittsburgh Flight Training Center, Inc. operated the company's flight instruction business. CAM Investments, Inc. served as the investment holding company and parent entity. Schreiner Air Investments, LLC held investment and ownership interests. The debtors sought joint administration to streamline case management, with all entities consolidated for voting, confirmation, and distributions under a limited substantive consolidation framework.
Fleet evolution and customer relationships. Corporate Air's fleet composition changed over time. The company operated multiple long-range Gulfstream Aerospace aircraft at its peak, including a Gulfstream G550 managed under a 2006 sublease agreement with Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.—the Pittsburgh-based sporting goods retailer that would become a long-running customer relationship. Under that arrangement, the G550 (Serial Number 5085) was owned by EWS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, while Corporate Air provided operational management including crew, maintenance, scheduling, and charter services when the aircraft was not required for Dick's executive travel. This managed aircraft model generated revenue through management fees, fuel sales, maintenance charges, and charter income when the aircraft flew third-party charters.
The company's fleet contracted in the years preceding bankruptcy. Corporate Air retired three long-range Gulfstream aircraft in 2024 as managed aircraft customers departed. By the September 2025 bankruptcy filing, the company's active fleet had shrunk to three aircraft: a Citation II light jet, a Citation X super-midsize jet, and a Gulfstream G280 super-midsize jet.
Customer Losses and Liquidity Decline
The proximate cause of Corporate Air's bankruptcy was the loss of Dick's Sporting Goods as a managed aircraft customer in 2023—a departure that removed what the First Day Declaration described as a significant portion of the company's managed aircraft revenue. The Dick's relationship had been among Corporate Air's longest-standing corporate accounts, dating to at least 2006 when the parties executed the G550 sublease agreement filed with the SEC. The loss of this major customer created revenue gaps across multiple business lines: management fees ended, fuel sales to the Dick's aircraft ceased, and maintenance revenue from servicing the Gulfstream ended.
Compounding contract losses. The Dick's departure in 2023 was followed by the loss of two additional service contracts in 2024, followed by another contract loss in 2025. Each departure further eroded the revenue base across charter, fuel, and maintenance operations. The First Day Declaration attributed these losses to "liquidity constraints" that increasingly limited the company's ability to invest in fleet, facilities, and customer service.
Asset sales and fleet reduction. By August 2025, Corporate Air faced a liquidity crisis. The company sold assets including aircraft and hangar space to generate cash. The 2024 retirement of three long-range Gulfstreams reduced the fleet ahead of the September 2025 filing.
Ground lease crisis. In August 2025, Allegheny County Airport—the public authority operating KAGC—threatened to terminate Corporate Air's ground leases. The lease termination threat preceded the $2 million bridge loan from Vantage AGC, LLC that cured the default.
Vantage Bridge Financing and the Path to Chapter 11
Vantage AGC, LLC emerged as Corporate Air's white knight in August 2025, providing a $2 million prepetition bridge loan that cured the lease default and preserved the company's airport presence. This intervention was not philanthropic—Vantage is an entity with experience in FBO operations and presumably recognized value in Corporate Air's airport location, FAA certificates, customer relationships, and trained workforce that could be captured through a structured acquisition. The bridge loan bought time for the parties to negotiate a restructuring support agreement (RSA) that would govern the bankruptcy process and ensure Vantage's acquisition of substantially all assets through a chapter 11 plan.
RSA framework and pre-arranged sale. Corporate Air filed its chapter 11 petitions on September 29, 2025, with a restructuring support agreement already in place that contemplated a pre-arranged sale of assets as a going concern to Vantage. This pre-negotiated structure allowed the company to move quickly through bankruptcy, avoiding the uncertainty and expense of a competitive sale process in favor of a sponsor-backed reorganization. The RSA established the framework for plan treatment, DIP financing terms, and timeline milestones that would govern the case.
Major creditor landscape. The chapter 11 schedules revealed a creditor body dominated by litigation claims and trade payables. The largest unsecured claim—$3.4 million—belonged to Francois Bitz, identified as a Pittsburgh technology entrepreneur whose claim arose from ongoing litigation with the company. The nature of the Bitz litigation was not detailed in publicly available sources, but the claim's size relative to the overall unsecured pool made it a significant factor in plan negotiations and distribution calculations. The six largest unsecured claims were litigation-related, underscoring that Corporate Air's financial distress extended beyond operational challenges to include material legal exposure.
Among trade creditors, Honeywell Aerospace held the largest claim at $373,682.19, likely reflecting amounts owed for avionics parts, maintenance services, or aircraft component support. World Fuel Services, a major aviation fuel supplier, held the second-largest trade claim at $354,933.27—representing unpaid fuel purchases that had accumulated as Corporate Air's cash position deteriorated. These trade creditor claims, while individually significant, would ultimately receive pro rata distributions from a $500,000 general unsecured creditor fund rather than full payment.
Vantage-Sponsored Plan Confirmation
The confirmed Second Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan implemented a going-concern reorganization that transferred substantially all of the debtors' assets to an FBO operator experienced in the aviation services industry. Vantage AGC, LLC—serving simultaneously as prepetition bridge lender, DIP lender, and plan sponsor—would convert its DIP claims to equity in the reorganized enterprise, effectively acquiring Corporate Air's operations through a debt-for-equity transaction structured within the chapter 11 framework.
DIP Financing Structure.
Vantage AGC provided up to $4.5 million in debtor-in-possession financing through its DIP Motion to fund the bankruptcy process and maintain operations through plan confirmation. The DIP facility was structured in tranches with $1.5 million available upon entry of the Interim DIP Order on October 1, 2025—just two days after the petition date. A Second Interim DIP Order on October 22, 2025, provided access to additional funds, with the Final DIP Order entered on October 29, 2025, making the full $4.5 million commitment available.
| DIP Term | Details |
|---|---|
| Lender | Vantage AGC, LLC |
| Total Commitment | $4.5 million |
| Interim Availability | $1.5 million |
| Interim Order Date | October 1, 2025 |
| Second Interim Order | October 22, 2025 |
| Final Order Date | October 29, 2025 |
| Key Milestone | Plan effectiveness within 90 days of petition date |
| Security | Superpriority administrative claims; priming liens |
| Section 506(c) Waiver | Yes |
| Carve-Out | Professional fee carve-out funded to reserve account |
The DIP facility imposed a critical 90-day milestone requiring plan effectiveness within approximately three months of the petition date. This aggressive timeline—ultimately achieved with days to spare through the December 15, 2025 confirmation—ensured the case moved quickly and limited the administrative costs that erode value in prolonged bankruptcies. The priming lien structure subordinated prepetition secured claims to the DIP facility, while the Section 506(c) waiver prevented the estates from surcharging DIP collateral for administrative expenses—standard protections for a lender providing rescue financing to a distressed borrower.
Plan Treatment by Class.
The confirmed plan established the following treatment for creditor classes, implementing limited substantive consolidation of all seven debtors for voting, confirmation, and distribution purposes:
| Class | Claim Type | Treatment | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unclassified | Administrative Claims | Paid in full in cash | Unimpaired |
| Unclassified | Professional Fee Claims | Paid in full in cash | Unimpaired |
| Unclassified | DIP Claims | Converted to pro rata share of New Common Equity | N/A |
| Unclassified | Priority Tax Claims | Paid per Bankruptcy Code requirements | N/A |
| Class 1 | Secured Tax Claims | Paid per plan terms | Unimpaired |
| Class 2 | Other Secured Claims | Paid per plan terms | Unimpaired |
| Class 3 | Other Priority Claims | Paid per plan terms | Unimpaired |
| Class 4 | Huntington Secured Claim | Paid per plan terms | Unimpaired |
| Class 5 | SBA Secured Claim | Paid per plan terms | Unimpaired |
| Class 6 | Vantage Bridge Secured Claim | Paid per plan terms | Impaired (Voting Class) |
| Class 7 | General Unsecured Claims | Pro rata share of $500,000 GUC Fund | Impaired |
| Class 8 | Intercompany Claims | Per plan terms | TBD |
| Class 9 | Intercompany Interests | Per plan terms | TBD |
| Class 10 | Section 510(b) Claims | Per plan terms | Impaired |
| Class 11 | Equity Interests | Cancelled and extinguished | Impaired |
General unsecured creditor treatment. The $500,000 distribution fund for Class 7 general unsecured claims represents the primary source of recovery for trade creditors, vendors, and other unsecured claimants. With total unsecured claims potentially exceeding $10 million based on the schedules—including the disputed $3.4 million Bitz claim—pro rata recoveries for unsecured creditors would likely fall in the single-digit percentage range absent significant claim disallowances. The GUC fund structure provided certainty of amount while leaving percentage recoveries dependent on the ultimate allowed claim pool.
Vantage's position. Vantage AGC's multi-faceted role as prepetition bridge lender, DIP lender, and plan sponsor created a path from emergency rescue financing to ownership of the reorganized enterprise. The $2 million prepetition bridge loan secured against estate assets. The $4.5 million DIP facility converted to equity under the plan, giving Vantage control of the reorganized FBO operations. This structure is common in sponsor-backed middle-market bankruptcies where the acquisition premium is effectively paid through the provision of rescue financing that allows the target to reorganize rather than liquidate.
Equity cancellation. Existing equity interests in CAM Investments, Inc. and the debtor entities were cancelled and extinguished under the plan. Mark Schreiner, the founder who had led Corporate Air for nearly 40 years, would lose his ownership stake—a common outcome in chapter 11 cases where liabilities exceed asset values and creditors are not paid in full.
Contested Matters and Plan Amendments.
The 77-day case was not without friction. The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors, formed to represent unsecured creditor interests, engaged actively on multiple fronts before ultimately supporting the confirmed plan.
UCC objection to DIP financing. The UCC filed objections to the DIP Motion on October 27, 2025, raising concerns about the terms and conditions of Vantage's postpetition lending. The specific objections were not detailed in available sources but likely addressed issues common in DIP disputes: the scope of priming liens, the adequacy of the carve-out for professional fees, milestone requirements that constrained case strategy, or releases and protections for the DIP lender. The objection was withdrawn on October 29, 2025, the same day the Final DIP Order was entered—suggesting the parties reached a negotiated resolution that addressed the committee's concerns.
Disclosure statement objections. Both Francois Bitz and the UCC objected to the adequacy of the initial disclosure statement filed on October 9, 2025. Bitz's objections presumably related to the treatment of his disputed $3.4 million claim and the disclosure of information relevant to evaluating plan treatment for unsecured creditors. The UCC's objections likely sought additional information about asset values, the basis for the GUC fund amount, and alternatives considered. These objections drove multiple rounds of plan and disclosure statement amendments—with iterations filed on October 9, November 3, November 10, and December 10, 2025—before the court approved the Disclosure Statement on November 12, 2025 and confirmed the plan on December 15, 2025.
Bitz claim objection. The debtors objected to Francois Bitz's $3.4 million claim on November 14, 2025, challenging the validity, amount, or priority of the largest unsecured claim in the case. The dispute remained pending at confirmation, meaning the Bitz claim would be resolved through post-confirmation litigation or negotiation rather than through the plan confirmation process. A successful objection would reduce the claims pool sharing in the $500,000 GUC fund, potentially increasing percentage recoveries for other unsecured creditors.
Professional Retentions.
The debtors and committee retained experienced restructuring professionals to guide the compressed case timeline:
| Professional | Role | Retention Order |
|---|---|---|
| Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP | Co-Counsel to Debtors | November 28, 2025 |
| Babst, Calland, Clements and Zomnir, P.C. | Co-Counsel to Debtors | October 28, 2025 |
| Riveron Management Services, LLC | CRO / Interim Management | November 28, 2025 |
| Omni Agent Solutions, Inc. | Claims & Noticing Agent | October 1, 2025 |
| Hilco Enterprise Valuation Services, LLC | Valuation Services | December 1, 2025 |
| Raines Feldman Littrell LLP | Counsel to UCC | November 7, 2025 |
The dual-counsel structure with Klehr Harrison (a Philadelphia-based restructuring firm) and Babst Calland (a Pittsburgh-based firm) provided both national restructuring expertise and local court presence in the Western District of Pennsylvania. Riveron's engagement as chief restructuring officer brought experienced interim management to oversee operations, cash management, and coordination with the sponsor through the bankruptcy process.
2025 Aviation Industry Distress
Corporate Air's bankruptcy unfolded against a backdrop of widespread financial distress in the aviation industry. The year 2025 saw multiple carriers—from major airlines to regional operators to charter and FBO providers—file for bankruptcy protection or cease operations entirely. This industry-wide stress provided context for Corporate Air's difficulties even as the company's specific challenges centered on customer concentration and contract losses rather than the macro factors affecting larger carriers.
2025 aviation bankruptcies and shutdowns. The industry casualty list grew throughout 2025. Spirit Airlines filed chapter 11 on August 29, 2025, as the ultra-low-cost carrier struggled with merger uncertainty and competitive pressure. Ravn Alaska ceased operations in August 2025, leaving rural Alaska communities without essential air service. Verijet filed chapter 7 in October 2025 and cancelled all flights, opting for liquidation rather than reorganization. European carriers Play and Braathens both shut down, underscoring the global nature of aviation industry stress. Kachina Air joined the chapter 11 casualty list, as did Corporate Air itself in September 2025.
Contributing factors. Industry analysts identified multiple factors driving the 2025 wave of aviation distress:
| Factor | Impact |
|---|---|
| COVID-era debt overhang | Many carriers took on substantial debt during the pandemic and continued servicing those obligations as the delayed impact was felt |
| Rising operating costs | Inflation drove up fuel, labor, insurance, and maintenance costs across the industry |
| Talent shortages | Aircraft repair technicians, pilots, and maintenance personnel remained in short supply |
| MRO constraints | Insufficient maintenance, repair, and overhaul capacity left aircraft grounded for days or weeks |
| Supply chain disruptions | Continued shortages of parts and components extended downtime and increased costs |
| Insurance premiums | Rising insurance costs added to operating expense pressure |
| Competitive intensity | Fierce competition compressed margins across the passenger and charter segments |
| Regulatory and tariff uncertainty | U.S. and international tariffs and regulatory shifts created planning challenges |
Market growth amid individual distress. Paradoxically, the broader private aviation market continued to grow even as individual operators struggled. The private jet charter services market reached an estimated $16.38 billion in 2025 with forecasts projecting growth to $24.02 billion by 2030 at a 7.95% compound annual growth rate. The air charter services market overall was expected to grow by $9.53 billion from 2025 to 2029, driven by cargo charter demand. This apparent contradiction—market growth alongside operator distress—reflected industry consolidation as weaker players exited and stronger competitors captured their market share.
Charter industry challenges. The Air Charter Association's first U.S. conference in 2025 highlighted the specific challenges facing charter operators: increased competition, taxation and tariff uncertainty, and persistent talent acquisition and retention difficulties. Industry observers noted that private aviation in 2025 faced shortages of aircraft repair technicians, insufficient MRO center capacity, continued supply-chain constraints on parts, and rising insurance premiums anticipated for 2026. These sector-wide headwinds compounded the company-specific challenges that drove Corporate Air into bankruptcy.
Key Timeline
The following chronology traces Corporate Air's trajectory from founding through chapter 11 emergence:
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| 1986 | Mark Schreiner founds Corporate Air at Allegheny County Airport |
| 1999 | Expansion begins; acquires Westinghouse Electric flight department |
| February 2006 | Aircraft Sublease Agreement executed with Dick's Sporting Goods for G550 management |
| 2023 | Loses Dick's Sporting Goods as managed aircraft customer — anchor relationship ends |
| 2024 | Loses two additional service contracts; retires three long-range Gulfstream aircraft |
| 2025 (Early) | Loses another contract; liquidity situation becomes dire |
| August 2025 | Ground lease termination threatened by Allegheny County Airport; Vantage AGC provides $2 million bridge loan to cure default |
| September 29, 2025 | Chapter 11 petitions filed (7 debtors in Western District of Pennsylvania) |
| October 1, 2025 | Joint Administration Order entered; DIP Interim Order ($1.5 million available); First Day Relief orders entered |
| October 9, 2025 | Initial Joint Chapter 11 Plan and Disclosure Statement filed |
| October 22, 2025 | Second Interim DIP Order entered |
| October 27, 2025 | UCC objects to DIP financing |
| October 29, 2025 | DIP Final Order entered ($4.5 million); UCC DIP objection withdrawn |
| November 3, 2025 | Amended Plan and Disclosure Statement filed |
| November 5, 2025 | UCC objects to Disclosure Statement |
| November 10, 2025 | Second Amended Plan and Disclosure Statement filed |
| November 12, 2025 | Disclosure Statement Approved |
| November 14, 2025 | Claim objection filed regarding Francois Bitz claim |
| November 28, 2025 | Professional retention orders entered |
| December 10, 2025 | Second Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan filed |
| December 11, 2025 | Voting declaration and confirmation memorandum filed |
| December 15, 2025 | Plan Confirmed (77 days from filing) |
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Corporate Air and what services did it provide?
Corporate Air, LLC was a Pittsburgh-area fixed-base operator (FBO) established in 1986 at Allegheny County Airport in West Mifflin, Pennsylvania. The company provided comprehensive aviation services including aircraft charter, aviation management for corporate-owned aircraft, flight training through Pittsburgh Flight Training Center, and traditional FBO services such as fuel sales, hangar space, and ground handling. At its peak, Corporate Air operated long-range Gulfstream aircraft and served major corporate clients including Dick's Sporting Goods.
Why did Corporate Air file for chapter 11 bankruptcy?
The bankruptcy was triggered by a cascading series of customer losses beginning in 2023 when anchor customer Dick's Sporting Goods departed as a managed aircraft customer. The company subsequently lost two additional service contracts in 2024 and another in 2025. These losses created a severe liquidity crisis as charter revenues, fuel sales, and maintenance income declined in tandem. By August 2025, the company faced threatened termination of its ground leases at Allegheny County Airport—an existential threat that forced the bankruptcy filing.
How quickly was the bankruptcy case resolved?
Corporate Air achieved one of the faster chapter 11 resolutions, proceeding from petition to confirmed plan in just 77 days (September 29 to December 15, 2025). This compressed timeline was driven by the DIP financing agreement's 90-day milestone requiring plan effectiveness within approximately three months of the petition date. The pre-arranged nature of the Vantage-sponsored sale facilitated this rapid resolution.
Who is Vantage AGC and what role did it play?
Vantage AGC, LLC served multiple roles throughout Corporate Air's distress and bankruptcy. In August 2025, Vantage provided a $2 million prepetition bridge loan that cured the company's ground lease default and preserved its airport presence. During the bankruptcy, Vantage provided $4.5 million in DIP financing to fund operations and administrative costs. As plan sponsor, Vantage's DIP claims converted to equity in the reorganized enterprise, effectively acquiring Corporate Air's going-concern operations through a debt-for-equity transaction.
What will general unsecured creditors receive?
General unsecured creditors will share pro rata in a $500,000 distribution fund. Major trade creditors include Honeywell Aerospace ($373,682) and World Fuel Services ($354,933). With total unsecured claims potentially exceeding $10 million—including the disputed $3.4 million Francois Bitz litigation claim—percentage recoveries will depend on the ultimate allowed claim pool but are expected to fall in the single-digit range.
What is the Francois Bitz litigation and why does it matter?
Pittsburgh technology entrepreneur Francois Bitz holds the largest unsecured claim in the case at $3.4 million, arising from ongoing litigation with the company. The specific nature of the dispute was not disclosed in available filings. The debtors objected to the Bitz claim in November 2025, and the dispute remained pending at plan confirmation. The outcome will affect distribution percentages for other unsecured creditors—if the claim is disallowed or reduced, remaining claimants would share in a larger portion of the $500,000 GUC fund.
What happened to Corporate Air's fleet during the decline?
Corporate Air's fleet contracted dramatically between 2023 and 2025. The company retired three long-range Gulfstream aircraft in 2024 as managed aircraft customers departed and charter revenues declined. By the bankruptcy filing, the active fleet had shrunk to just three aircraft: a Citation II light jet, a Citation X super-midsize jet, and a Gulfstream G280 super-midsize jet. The company also sold aircraft and hangar assets to generate liquidity during its pre-bankruptcy distress.
Which entities were included in the bankruptcy filing?
Seven entities filed chapter 11 petitions and were jointly administered: Corporate Air, LLC (lead debtor and primary operating entity); Steel City Aviation, LLC and Steel City Aviation, Inc. (aviation operations); Cheyenne, LLC (aircraft holding entity); Pittsburgh Flight Training Center, Inc. (flight training); CAM Investments, Inc. (parent holding company); and Schreiner Air Investments, LLC (investment entity). The plan implemented limited substantive consolidation for voting, confirmation, and distributions.
What contested matters arose during the case?
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors objected to both the DIP financing and disclosure statement adequacy. The DIP objection was withdrawn on October 29, 2025, the same day the Final DIP Order was entered, suggesting a negotiated resolution. Disclosure statement objections from both Bitz and the UCC drove multiple plan amendments before final approval. The Bitz claim objection remained pending at confirmation, to be resolved post-emergence.
How does Corporate Air fit into the broader 2025 aviation distress?
Corporate Air was one of numerous aviation companies filing bankruptcy in 2025—a year that saw Spirit Airlines, Ravn Alaska, Verijet, Kachina Air, and international carriers Play and Braathens either file chapter 11 or cease operations entirely. Industry-wide factors including COVID-era debt overhang, rising operating costs, talent shortages, MRO constraints, supply chain disruptions, and competitive pressure contributed to widespread distress even as the overall private aviation market continued to grow.
For more bankruptcy case analyses and restructuring insights, visit ElevenFlo's bankruptcy blog.
