Red Lobster emerged from chapter 11 in September 2024 as a reorganized company owned by a Fortress-led lender group, having pushed its prepetition term-loan lenders' restructuring support agreement through a reorganized-equity sale that left general unsecured creditors recovering through a litigation trust rather than cash. Red Lobster Management LLC, the largest North American seafood restaurant chain, filed chapter 11 petitions in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida on May 19, 2024 under lead case 6:24-bk-02486, while keeping restaurants open.
Red Lobster entered chapter 11 with a court-supervised sale process already in motion under a restructuring support agreement signed days before filing, then implemented a confirmed plan that preserved going-concern value for the term lenders and channeled equityholder-related litigation claims into a trust for general unsecured creditors. The prepetition term lenders also served as the stalking horse buyer, and the case record tied the debtor's distress in part to a $20 "Ultimate Endless Shrimp" promotion made permanent in May 2023.
December 2024 (all cases closed except the RLSV, Inc. wind-down case)
Case Snapshot
Traffic Decline, Vendor Stress, and the Endless Shrimp Rollout
Red Lobster operated as what management described in bankruptcy filings as the largest North American seafood restaurant chain. The company employed about 36,000 workers—roughly 34,000 in the United States and 2,000 in Canada—and the first day declaration of Jonathan Tibus describes a footprint carried on 687 total leases. The chain passed from Darden Restaurants to Golden Gate Capital in 2014, and Thai Union, a Bangkok-based seafood company, became its largest investor in 2020 and later its majority owner.
The filings tie the distress to a multiyear traffic and profitability decline that turned into a near-term liquidity cliff. The first day declaration reports a $76 million net loss for fiscal 2023, annual guest counts down about 30% since 2019, and a cash balance that fell from roughly $100 million in May 2023 to under $30 million within about six months. Management attributed the filing to a difficult macroeconomic environment, an underperforming footprint, failed strategic initiatives, and increased competition, with vendor pressure—including missed payments and disrupted shrimp sourcing—compounding the cash drain as the debtors tried to conserve liquidity. Tibus also described a pre-filing effort to pursue an out-of-court restructuring supported by the term loan lenders and Thai Union that did not close, with lenders unwilling to provide incremental liquidity.
Red Lobster made the $20 Ultimate Endless Shrimp offering permanent in May 2023, a change the first day declaration links to a reported $11 million cost impact and supply strain, and which was adopted despite pushback from members of management. After emergence, new CEO Damola Adamolekun said the promotion caused "a lot of chaos" in a Fox Business interview. The promotion also intersected with a procurement dispute: bankruptcy filings were described as investigating Thai Union's alleged undue influence in shrimp purchasing decisions, and Thai Union publicly disputed allegations related to the endless shrimp strategy. Those claims were preserved as a recovery source for unsecured creditors through the plan's trust structure.
Capital Structure and the $175 Million DIP Roll-Up
Court filings describe a comparatively simple funded-debt stack for a restaurant chain of Red Lobster's size: a secured term loan and an ABL facility totaling about $294 million. The first day declaration identifies approximately $264.7 million outstanding under the prepetition term loan, secured by substantially all assets with Fortress Credit Corp. as agent, about $29.3 million of letters of credit outstanding under the $100 million ABL facility with no funded loans at filing, and roughly $1.1 million of commercial card obligations. The ABL lender holds senior liens on certain current assets—cash, inventory, and credit card receivables—while the term loan parties hold senior liens on the remaining collateral. The same declaration states the debtors signed a restructuring support agreement with the prepetition term loan lenders on May 9, 2024, fixing the framework for DIP financing, a stalking-horse bid, and case milestones before the petition was filed.
The final DIP order authorized a postpetition financing package with an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $275 million and identified Fortress Credit Corp. as administrative agent and collateral agent. The facility combined $100 million of new money with a $175 million roll-up that converted prepetition secured obligations into superpriority DIP obligations, and it granted the DIP secured parties superpriority administrative-expense status and liens on the collateral package. Interim new-money availability was capped at up to $40 million before entry of the final order.
The DIP terms reflected how quickly the case was intended to move. Maturity was pegged to the earliest of a fixed outside date, the plan effective date, or the closing of a sale of substantially all assets, and the order imposed a weekly budget with permitted variance thresholds that tightened after the first test periods. Pricing was set at a reference rate plus 9.50% or adjusted term SOFR plus 10.50%, and the order provided adequate protection to the prepetition secured parties—including replacement liens, superpriority claims, and credit-bid rights—for their consent to the use of cash collateral and the priming of prepetition liens.
Term
Summary (court filings)
Total DIP facility
Up to $275.0 million ($100.0 million new money + $175.0 million roll-up)
Interim new-money availability
Up to $40.0 million, increasing after entry of the final order
Agent
Fortress Credit Corp. (administrative and collateral agent)
Pricing
Reference rate + 9.50% or adjusted term SOFR + 10.50%
Maturity
Earliest of a fixed outside date, plan effective date, or closing of a sale of substantially all assets
Covenants
Weekly budget with permitted variance thresholds
Adequate protection
Replacement liens, superpriority claims, and credit-bid rights
DIP Financing Summary
Stalking Horse Sale and the Canceled July Auction
Red Lobster entered chapter 11 with a stalking horse transaction in hand and a court-supervised sale process designed to preserve going-concern value while reducing the footprint. The bidding procedures order approved RL Purchaser LLC—an entity controlled by the prepetition term lenders—as stalking horse bidder and permitted it to credit bid all or part of its claim, subject to preserved objection rights under the DIP framework. The order set a July 18, 2024 bid deadline, a July 23 auction if competing qualified bids emerged, and a July 29 sale hearing.
No topping bid materialized. The company canceled the July 2024 auction after receiving no bids by the deadline other than the stalking horse bidder, and that reporting characterized the proposed purchase price as $376 million structured with debt and DIP financing components. Reporting positioned Fortress Investment Group to acquire the chain and highlighted Fortress's broader restaurant platform through its ownership of SPB Hospitality. With no competing proposal, the confirmation support memorandum states the debtors pivoted from a standalone section 363 closing to consummating the transaction through a reorganized-equity sale under the plan.
Reorganized-Equity Sale and the GUC Trust
The plan was RSA-backed from the start. The confirmation support memorandum describes the May 9, 2024 RSA with the prepetition term loan lenders as covering DIP support, the stalking-horse bid, and the path to a reorganized-equity sale, and states that the purchaser elected to implement the deal under section 1129 by acquiring substantially all assets and the reorganized equity interests rather than through a standalone 363 sale. The confirmation order referenced an amended and restated purchase agreement dated August 22, 2024 identifying RL Investor Holdings LLC as purchaser, and approved the plan supplement and the contribution of equityholder litigation claims to the GUC trust.
The disclosure statement sets out the full classification scheme. Class 1 (miscellaneous secured) and Class 2 (other priority) are unimpaired, deemed to accept, and projected to recover 100%—Class 1 receives cash, its collateral, or other non-impairing treatment, and Class 2 is paid in full in cash. Class 3 (prepetition term loan) is impaired and voting, receiving a pro rata share of net proceeds from the sale transaction plus 60% of the net proceeds of the equityholder litigation claims. Class 4 (general unsecured) is impaired and voting, receiving pro rata beneficial interests in the GUC trust and the residual 40% of equityholder-litigation net proceeds. Class 5 (intercompany) and Class 6 (interests) are impaired, deemed to reject, and receive nothing—all such claims and interests, other than sold equity, are cancelled and extinguished. The disclosure statement leaves projected recoveries for Class 3 and Class 4 as "unknown" because each turns on sale and litigation outcomes.
For unsecured creditors, the GUC trust is the operative mechanism. The disclosure statement defines GUC trust assets to include the GUC Fund, the equityholder litigation claims, and the resulting litigation proceeds, all of which vest automatically in the trust on the effective date for the benefit of allowed general unsecured claims. Public reporting described the trust as targeting former equity holders and executives.
On the effective date, all DIP claims were satisfied in full through the reorganized-equity-sale mechanics described in the confirmation order: transfer of purchased assets, assumption and assignment of specified contracts and leases, assumption of specified liabilities, issuance of equity in the reorganized debtors (other than RL Management), and issuance of takeback loans. The DIP facility was then cancelled and the DIP liens released, and the reorganized debtors were required to pay the DIP agent's and prepetition term loan agent's fees in cash within three business days of invoice. The post-confirmation ownership group was described publicly as a Fortress-led buyer group with co-investors TCW Private Credit and Blue Torch, alongside a $60 million new funding commitment and the appointment of Damola Adamolekun as CEO.
Class
Impairment
Class 1 — Misc. secured
Unimpaired
Class 2 — Other priority
Unimpaired
Class 3 — Prepetition term loan
Impaired (voting)
Class 4 — General unsecured
Impaired (voting)
Class 5 — Intercompany
Impaired (deemed reject)
Class 6 — Interests
Impaired (deemed reject)
Plan Class Treatment
Committee DIP Objection and U.S. Trustee Fee Fight
Two contested matters stand out from the record. The official committee of unsecured creditors filed a DIP objection on June 12, 2024 that framed the early fight over value. The committee challenged the size of the roll-up—which it characterized as a $160 million roll-up of prepetition debt—objected to the breadth of the adequate-protection and administrative-expense treatment granted to the DIP and prepetition secured parties, and challenged the DIP milestones tied to the sale process. The committee's concern was that a roll-up DIP plus credit-bid economics would place most enterprise value under the secured layer before unsecured creditors could test it.
The U.S. Trustee filed a confirmation objection attacking the plan's attempt to insulate post-effective-date actors from statutory fee obligations. The objection argued that the GUC trust, the GUC trustee, the reorganized debtors, and the purchaser could not be exempted from quarterly U.S. Trustee fees and related reporting until the cases were actually closed, converted, or dismissed, and it criticized the limited oversight structure proposed for the GUC trust and plan administrator. The plan proceeded to confirmation, with Judge Grace E. Robson entering the confirmation order on September 6, 2024.
Lease Rejections and Claims Administration
Lease overhang and contract rationalization were the largest operational workstreams in the case. The first day declaration describes a footprint carried on 687 total leases, and the debtors closed and vacated 93 underperforming stores on May 13, 2024, days before filing. Trade coverage tracked the continuing closure program, including roughly 100 units closed in May 2024 and additional unprofitable stores slated to close that summer, leaving a go-forward footprint described around confirmation as 544 locations across 44 U.S. states and four Canadian provinces. Each closed location generated lease-rejection damages, cure disputes, and assumption-and-assignment questions that fed the claims process.
The notice of effective date set the post-emergence deadline structure: rejection-damages claims for executory contracts and unexpired leases were due within 30 days after the latest of an order approving rejection (including confirmation), the rejection effective date, or the plan effective date, and administrative-expense claims (subject to exclusions) were due within 30 days after the plan effective date. Epiq Corporate Restructuring, LLC served as the notice, claims, and solicitation agent, maintaining the official claims register, receiving proofs of claim, and distributing solicitation materials. The court also entered a claims objection procedures order to govern omnibus claim administration across the large lease and vendor claim populations.
Professional Retentions and Fee Awards
Red Lobster's restructuring used a standard large-restructuring advisor set: debtor co-counsel, an investment banker, a financial advisor, and committee professionals. The debtors retained King & Spalding LLP and Berger Singerman LLP as co-counsel, Hilco Corporate Finance as investment banker, Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC as financial advisor (providing the CRO/CEO and additional personnel through Jonathan Tibus), and Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP as Canadian special counsel, supporting concurrent CCAA recognition proceedings in Canada that completed in October 2024. The official committee retained Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as lead counsel, Pack Law as co-counsel, and Genesis Credit Partners LLC as financial advisor.
The court entered fee orders around confirmation and the September 16, 2024 effective date. It awarded Alvarez & Marsal $6.0 million in fees plus $0.18 million in expenses, and entered separate compensation orders for King & Spalding, committee counsel Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones, and investment banker Hilco Corporate Finance, whose retention was structured around restructuring- and sale-transaction fees rather than hourly billing.
Professional firm
Allowed fees + expenses
Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC
$6,002,715.00 fees; $180,220.32 expenses
King & Spalding LLP
$7,770,225.00 fees; $38,005.25 expenses
Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP
$1,177,413.50 fees; $9,623.72 expenses
Hilco Corporate Finance, LLC
$1,300,000.00 fees; $13,865.03 expenses
Selected Professional Fee Awards
Final Decree and Post-Effective Wind-Down
The plan effective date occurred on September 16, 2024, as stated in the notice of effective date, and the case moved into a post-effective phase focused on claims administration, GUC trust implementation, and resolving remaining contested matters. In December 2024, the court entered a final decree closing the cases for the reorganized debtors while leaving the RLSV, Inc. case open as a remaining wind-down vehicle. Post-emergence, CEO Adamolekun described a turnaround plan centered on menu optimization, facility renovations, and footprint rationalization, though the chain continued to close underperforming locations through 2025 and into 2026.
Date
Milestone
May 9, 2024
RSA executed with prepetition term loan lenders
May 13, 2024
93 underperforming stores closed and vacated
May 19, 2024
Chapter 11 petitions filed; restaurants remained open
June 14, 2024
Final DIP order and bidding procedures order entered
July 23, 2024
Auction canceled after no competing qualified bids
September 5, 2024
Plan confirmation hearing; buyer group and new CEO identified
September 6, 2024
Confirmation order entered
September 16, 2024
Plan effective date
December 2024
Final decree entered; RLSV, Inc. wind-down case remained open
Key Timeline
Frequently Asked Questions
When and where did Red Lobster file for chapter 11 bankruptcy?
Did "Ultimate Endless Shrimp" play a material role?
The shift to a permanent Ultimate Endless Shrimp offering in May 2023 was associated with a reported $11 million cost impact. After emergence, new CEO Damola Adamolekun described the offering as creating "a lot of chaos" in a Fox Business interview.
Class 4 general unsecured creditors are impaired and receive pro rata beneficial interests in a GUC trust funded by the GUC Fund and equityholder litigation claims, including 40% of those claims' net proceeds; the prepetition term loan class takes the other 60%. The disclosure statement projects the recovery as unknown because it depends on litigation outcomes.
Who is the claims agent for Red Lobster?
Epiq Corporate Restructuring, LLC serves as the notice, claims, and solicitation agent, maintaining the official claims register and administering creditor noticing and solicitation in the case.
turnaround plan https://fortune.com/2025/10/01/red-lobster-ceo-damola-adamolekun-comeback-plan-bankruptcy/
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida https://www.nrn.com/casual-dining/red-lobster-files-for-chapter-11-bankruptcy-protection
This article was researched and written with AI assistance, using court filings, public records, and news sources. AI-generated content can contain errors. Verify all information against primary sources before relying on it. This is not legal or financial advice. See the disclaimer.