Tricolor Holdings: $800M Fraud Collapses Subprime Auto Giant
Tricolor Holdings filed directly for Chapter 7 liquidation in September 2025 after allegedly double-pledging $800 million in collateral to major banks including JPMorgan and Fifth Third. CEO Daniel Chu faces life in prison. Complete analysis of the fraud scheme, criminal charges, and Chapter 7 liquidation.
Tricolor Holdings, the seventh-largest independent used car chain in the United States, shut down operations in September 2025 in what one restructuring attorney called "the quickest meltdown that I have ever seen." The Dallas-based subprime auto lender—which had built a $5 billion loan portfolio by serving Hispanic immigrants with no credit history—closed 60 retail locations within days, filing directly for chapter 7 liquidation rather than attempting reorganization under chapter 11.
Three months later, federal prosecutors charged founder and CEO Daniel Chu and COO David Goodgame with running a "financial crimes enterprise" that allegedly double-pledged approximately $800 million in collateral. JPMorgan Chase took a $170 million charge-off; CEO Jamie Dimon said, "When you see one cockroach, there's probably more." Fifth Third Bank recorded a $170 to $200 million impairment charge, bringing disclosed bank losses to over $340 million.
Tricolor filed directly for chapter 7 liquidation. With approximately 10,000 vehicles spread across 60 locations, 100,000 loan accounts, and over 25,000 creditors, chapter 7 Trustee Anne Elizabeth Burns is overseeing the liquidation while federal prosecutors pursue criminal charges that could result in life imprisonment for Chu.
| Debtor(s) | Tricolor Holdings, LLC |
| Headquarters | Irving, Texas |
| Industry | Subprime Auto Lending / Used Car Retail |
| Founded | 2007 |
| Founder/CEO | Daniel Chu (arrested December 2025) |
| Petition Date | September 10, 2025 |
| Court | U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Texas |
| Case Number | 25-42659 |
| Chapter 7 Trustee | Anne Elizabeth Burns |
| Retail Locations | ~60 |
| Employees (Pre-Filing) | ~1,000+ |
| Vehicles to Liquidate | ~10,000 |
| Loan Accounts | ~100,000 |
| Creditors | 25,000+ |
| Assets Pledged | $2.2 billion (alleged) |
| Actual Collateral | $1.4 billion (alleged) |
| Alleged Collateral Shortfall | ~$800 million |
| Vehicle Sales Deadline | March 31, 2026 |
Company Background: Hispanic-Focused Auto Lender
Founding and mission. Daniel Chu founded Tricolor Holdings in 2007 in Irving, Texas, building on experience he gained after co-founding PAACO Automotive Group in 1992. The son of Chinese immigrants who fled the Communist takeover of China in 1949, Chu grew up in Dallas and targeted Hispanic immigrants who needed vehicles but lacked credit history to obtain traditional financing.
The name "Tricolor" was chosen—it is the nickname Mexicans use for their national flag and soccer team, signaling the company's target demographic. Chu built a buy-here-pay-here model designed specifically for customers that traditional lenders would not serve, and Tricolor eventually became the nation's largest used vehicle retailer focusing on Hispanic consumers.
Customer demographics. The company's business model targeted borrowers who were largely outside traditional credit reporting. According to company data reported in industry publications, 68% of borrowers had no credit score whatsoever, and over 50% did not hold a driver's license at the time of purchase. Among those customers who did have a FICO score, only about one in five was above the subprime threshold. Approximately 75% of Tricolor's customers were undocumented Hispanic immigrants.
This demographic profile shaped the company's lending practices. Interest rates often exceeded 20%. Over the years, Tricolor disbursed more than $5 billion in auto loans to Hispanic car buyers, creating substantial loan portfolios that were then financed through warehouse lending arrangements with major banks.
Scale and recognition. At its peak, Tricolor operated as the third-largest used auto retailer in Texas and California and the seventh-largest independent used car chain nationally. The company operated under multiple brand names—Tricolor Auto, Ganas Auto, Ganas Ya, and Lucky Lane Motors—spanning approximately 60 retail locations across Texas, the broader Southwest, and Illinois. The workforce included more than 1,000 employees across dealership operations, loan servicing, collections, and corporate functions.
Tricolor gained recognition as one of the fastest-growing private companies during 2012, 2013, and 2014. The company financed its loan portfolio through warehouse lending facilities from major financial institutions.
The buy-here-pay-here model. Tricolor operated as an integrated retailer and lender, originating auto loans at the point of sale rather than referring customers to third-party financing. This buy-here-pay-here model is common in subprime auto lending because traditional lenders often decline to finance vehicles for borrowers without established credit. The dealership takes on the financing risk.
For Tricolor, the model created a vertically integrated business: the company acquired used vehicles, sold them to customers at retail prices, originated the financing, serviced the loans, and collected payments. When borrowers defaulted, Tricolor could repossess the vehicle and resell it. The loan portfolio served as collateral for warehouse lending facilities from banks, which funded vehicle purchases and loan originations.
The Alleged $800 Million Fraud Scheme
Double-pledging mechanics. Federal prosecutors allege that Tricolor executives deceived lenders by pledging the same collateral to multiple creditors. According to the indictment, as of August 2025, Tricolor had approximately $1.4 billion of real collateral but had pledged $2.2 billion to lenders and investors. The alleged shortfall of approximately $800 million resulted from executives double-counting collateral—pledging the same auto loans and vehicles to multiple financing sources.
The scheme allegedly ran from at least 2018 through September 2025, during which time executives allegedly obtained billions of dollars from lenders and investors through misrepresentations about the company's collateral position. Allegations include not only double-pledging but also fabricating auto loans entirely, creating assets that existed only on paper.
Warehouse lending structure. The fraud allegations center on warehouse lending—a financing structure common in auto lending where an originator (Tricolor) borrows against pools of auto loans held as collateral. Multiple banks had extended warehouse lines to Tricolor, each believing they held security interests in specific loan portfolios. The alleged double-pledging meant that several banks held security interests in the same collateral, creating competing claims that would later require resolution in bankruptcy.
Bank Losses
Major banks disclosed charges related to Tricolor in their 2025 financial statements:
| Institution | Disclosed Loss | Details |
|---|---|---|
| JPMorgan Chase | $170 million | Charge-off disclosed October 2025 |
| Fifth Third Bancorp | $170–$200 million | Non-cash impairment charge, Q3 2025 |
| Barclays | Undisclosed | Exposure confirmed by reporting |
| Combined Major Bank Losses | $340M+ | Disclosed losses only |
Fifth Third Bank was among the first to signal trouble. The bank expected to record a non-cash impairment charge of $170 to $200 million in Q3 2025 tied to alleged fraudulent activity involving Tricolor Holdings. The loan carried an outstanding balance of approximately $200 million, and Fifth Third confirmed it had been working with law enforcement to investigate the apparent fraud before the bankruptcy filing.
JPMorgan Chase subsequently disclosed a $170 million charge-off related to Tricolor. Addressing the losses, Dimon stated: "It is not our finest moment." He added: "When you see one cockroach, there's probably more."
JPMorgan announced it was reviewing its underwriting processes after the charge-off. Dimon stated that bankruptcies in the U.S. auto market are a sign lending standards grew too lax over the past decade-plus, calling them "early signs there might be some excess out there." Dimon stated: "There clearly was, in my opinion, fraud involved in a bunch of these things."
Additional secured creditors with exposure to Tricolor include Wilmington Trust, National Association (serving as Indenture Trustee for secured notes), TBK Bank, Origin Bank, ACV Capital, and Cox Automotive. The Chapter 7 Trustee's filings indicate a complex priority structure with multiple layers of secured creditors holding competing interests in vehicle inventory and receivables.
Secured Creditor Structure
| Creditor | Role | Interest |
|---|---|---|
| Wilmington Trust, N.A. | Indenture Trustee | Secured notes |
| JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | Secured Lender | Vehicle floor plan/inventory financing |
| Fifth Third Bank | Secured Lender | Vehicle/receivables financing |
| TBK Bank | Secured Lender | Vehicle/receivables financing |
| Origin Bank | Secured Lender | Vehicle/receivables financing |
| Barclays | Secured Lender | Warehouse facility |
| ACV Capital, LLC | Secured Creditor | Auction/wholesale financing |
| Cox Automotive | Secured Creditor | Auction/logistics services |
The multi-lender structure created complex priority disputes that the Chapter 7 Trustee must navigate. Each secured creditor believed it held a first-priority security interest in specific collateral—but the alleged double-pledging meant that multiple lenders held ostensibly senior claims on the same assets. Resolving these disputes requires determining lien priority and allocating proceeds across competing claims.
In chapter 7, the trustee can liquidate assets and hold proceeds in escrow pending resolution of competing claims rather than continue operations.
Criminal Charges and Arrests
Federal indictment. On December 17, 2025—approximately three months after the bankruptcy filing—federal prosecutors unsealed criminal charges against Tricolor's top executives. U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton described Tricolor as a "financial crimes enterprise."
Defendants and Charges
| Defendant | Role | Location | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Chu | Founder/CEO | Miami, FL | Arrested; faces life in prison |
| David Goodgame | COO | Waxahachie, TX | Arrested |
| Jerome Kollar | Former Executive | — | Pled guilty; cooperating |
| Ameryn Seibold | Former Executive | — | Pled guilty; cooperating |
Daniel Chu, 62, was arrested in Florida, while David Goodgame, 49, was arrested in Texas. The indictment charges both with conspiracy, bank fraud, and running a Continuing Financial Crimes Enterprise.
Maximum penalties. The Continuing Financial Crimes Enterprise charge carries a maximum sentence of life in prison. Daniel Chu faces a maximum sentence of life in prison if convicted on that charge.
Cooperating witnesses. Jerome Kollar and Ameryn Seibold both pled guilty and are cooperating with the investigation. Fortune reported the guilty pleas confirmed a $1 billion fraud—though the indictment focuses on the approximately $800 million in double-pledged collateral.
Civil versus criminal liability. The criminal prosecution runs parallel to civil claims that the Chapter 7 Trustee may pursue. In bankruptcy, the Trustee can bring avoidance actions, breach of fiduciary duty claims, and fraudulent transfer claims against former executives and others who may have benefited from or enabled the alleged fraud. The Trustee's December 2025 lawsuit marks the start of this civil litigation track.
The criminal and civil proceedings are independent but related. A criminal conviction would establish facts that could be used collaterally in civil litigation (though the reverse is not true—a civil judgment cannot establish guilt in a criminal case).
The Overnight Collapse
September 4, 2025: Doors locked. On September 4, 2025, Tricolor abruptly shut down dealership operations, locking employees and customers out of all 60 retail locations with little to no explanation. More than 1,000 employees were terminated as operations ceased nearly overnight. Sidley Austin partner Tom Califano, a restructuring attorney, called it "the quickest meltdown that I have ever seen."
September 10, 2025: Chapter 7 filing. Six days after the operational shutdown, Tricolor filed directly for chapter 7 liquidation in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas. Bloomberg Law noted that direct-to-chapter-7 filings by large businesses are rare, as most companies of this scale at least attempt chapter 11 reorganization—even if ultimately unsuccessful.
Customer impact. The abrupt shutdown left borrowers in a difficult position. Some Houston customers reported being left without cars, and some customers experienced wrongful repossession when they brought their vehicles in for service at the moment dealerships closed.
The Texas Department of Motor Vehicles launched an investigation into 157 complaints related to Tricolor Auto. Customers were directed to file complaints at TxDMV.gov, while financing complaints were handled by the Office of Consumer Credit Commissioner. The regulatory response addressed consumer protection issues alongside the commercial losses suffered by institutional lenders.
Chapter 7 Liquidation: A Rare Structure for a Large Business
Why direct chapter 7. A direct-to-chapter-7 filing results in liquidation rather than a going-concern sale or reorganization. Bloomberg Law noted that direct-to-chapter-7 filings by large businesses are rare.
Chapter 7 Trustee. Anne Elizabeth Burns was appointed chapter 7 Trustee to oversee the liquidation. Unlike a chapter 11 debtor-in-possession structure—where existing management typically retains control subject to court oversight—a chapter 7 trustee assumes complete control of the estate and is charged with liquidating assets for the benefit of creditors.
The Trustee filed a lawsuit in Texas in December 2025 related to Tricolor's collapse.
Cash position and collateral. Court filings indicate approximately $2.6 million in the Trustee's account at the outset of the case. The Trustee filed an Emergency Motion to Use Cash Collateral seeking authorization to use approximately $275,000 for insurance premiums (to maintain coverage on vehicle inventory), professional fees, and administrative costs of liquidation.
The Trustee sought limited authorization to operate certain aspects of the business solely for purposes of orderly liquidation. Authorized activities include maintaining insurance on vehicle inventory, preserving and securing assets at retail locations, coordinating with auction service providers, processing title and registration documents, and managing utility services at locations pending closure. Critically, the Trustee was not authorized to continue retail sales operations, originate new loans, or hire additional employees beyond liquidation needs.
Trustee administration in fraud cases. The chapter 7 Trustee's role in a fraud case differs from administration of a straightforward liquidation. In addition to the standard duties of marshaling assets and distributing proceeds to creditors, the Trustee in a fraud case must:
- Investigate the circumstances of the company's collapse and the conduct of former management
- Pursue litigation claims against insiders, professionals, and third parties who may have enabled the fraud
- Coordinate with criminal prosecutors who may have overlapping investigative interests
- Navigate competing claims from multiple secured creditors whose security interests may be disputed
- Preserve evidence that may be relevant to both civil and criminal proceedings
The Tricolor case includes these tasks. The December 2025 lawsuit begins the civil litigation track related to the collapse.
Differences from chapter 11 administration. In a typical chapter 11 case, the debtor remains in possession and attempts to reorganize while maintaining operations. Professional fees are paid as administrative expenses, and the goal is preservation of going-concern value. In Tricolor's chapter 7, no reorganization was attempted, no going-concern sale was pursued, and the Trustee's focus is liquidation and distribution.
This structural difference has practical implications for creditors. In chapter 11, secured creditors often negotiate adequate protection arrangements while the debtor uses cash collateral. In Tricolor's chapter 7, the Trustee's use of $275,000 in cash collateral for insurance and administrative costs does not involve ongoing operations that could generate replacement collateral. Secured creditors are paid from liquidation proceeds and any litigation recoveries that become part of the estate.
Vehicle Liquidation Process
Inventory scale. The liquidation involves approximately 10,000 vehicles spread across roughly 60 retail locations, plus approximately 100,000 loan accounts that represent the receivables side of the business. Vehicle conditions vary significantly, and the geographic dispersion adds complexity to the disposition process.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Total Vehicles | ~10,000 |
| Loan Accounts | ~100,000 |
| Retail Locations | ~60 |
| Vehicle Condition | Varying (some poor, some good) |
Auction service providers. The Trustee retained multiple providers to handle the vehicle disposition:
| Provider | Role |
|---|---|
| Vervent Inc. | Auction services, vehicle disposition, loan portfolio servicing |
| Holman (Automotive Rentals, Inc.) | Auction services, logistics |
Vervent Inc. plays a dual role: in addition to auction services, it was appointed as the new servicer of Tricolor's loan portfolio, taking over payment collection, delinquency management, and customer account administration. This continuity is important for borrowers who are current on their loans—the servicing transition ensures their payments continue to be credited appropriately.
Liquidation challenges. The Trustee's sale motion identified significant challenges:
- Vehicles dispersed across approximately 60 locations, requiring logistical coordination
- Varying vehicle conditions necessitating assessment before sale
- Complex lien structures on individual vehicles due to alleged double-pledging
- Need for orderly disposition to maximize value rather than fire-sale pricing
- Insurance and storage costs mounting during the liquidation period
Sale timeline. The court established the following milestones:
| Milestone | Date |
|---|---|
| Proceeds Bar Date | January 31, 2026 |
| Vehicle Sales Deadline | March 31, 2026 |
The multi-month timeline reflects the complexity of liquidating a geographically dispersed vehicle fleet while ensuring proper title clearance and coordinating with multiple secured creditors who may have competing claims on specific vehicles.
Customer and Borrower Guidance
The abrupt shutdown created widespread confusion among Tricolor's approximately 100,000 borrowers. Automotive expert Brian Moody advised customers to continue making payments, explaining that auto loans are typically with a financial institution rather than the dealership itself. Even though the retail operations ceased, the underlying loan obligations remain in effect.
With Vervent Inc. appointed as the new servicer of Tricolor's loan portfolio, borrowers should receive communication regarding where to direct payments. Vervent handles payment collection, delinquency management, and customer account administration.
For borrowers who experienced issues such as wrongful repossession or inability to obtain title documents, the Texas Department of Motor Vehicles provides a complaint portal at TxDMV.gov. Financing-related complaints can be directed to the Office of Consumer Credit Commissioner. Given the scale of the collapse—60 locations and 100,000 loan accounts—borrowers may experience delays in account transfers and documentation.
Title and registration concerns. One of the more complex issues facing Tricolor's borrowers involves vehicle titles. In a typical buy-here-pay-here arrangement, the dealership holds the vehicle title as security until the borrower pays off the loan. With Tricolor's abrupt collapse, the status of these titles—and the ability of borrowers to obtain clear title upon loan payoff—became uncertain.
Borrowers who have paid off their loans but have not received their titles should contact Vervent Inc., the appointed loan servicer. The Chapter 7 Trustee's limited operating authority includes processing title and registration documents, so the administrative infrastructure for title release should remain functional. However, given the disputed liens on many of Tricolor's assets, some borrowers may face delays as the Trustee sorts out competing claims.
Borrowers in default. For borrowers who fell behind on payments before or after the collapse, the situation is more complex. Vervent Inc. manages delinquency collections, and the standard remedies available to any secured lender—including repossession—remain available. However, given the chaos surrounding the collapse, borrowers who were improperly repossessed (for example, those who brought vehicles in for service and found them seized) may have claims against the estate.
Borrowers facing hardship should contact Vervent Inc. directly to discuss their options. While the bankruptcy proceeding will not modify the terms of individual loan agreements, the transition to a new servicer may provide opportunities to negotiate payment plans or other arrangements. Borrowers who believe they were treated improperly during the shutdown should document their experience and file complaints with the appropriate state agencies.
Industry Context: Subprime Auto Distress
Record delinquencies. Tricolor's collapse occurred against a backdrop of historic stress in the subprime auto lending sector. By early 2025, risky borrowers 60 or more days behind on car loans had climbed to 6.65%, the highest level in over 30 years. Subprime delinquencies hit a record 6.6% in January 2025, the highest since tracking began in 1994. The total delinquent auto loan balance across the industry exceeded $60 billion.
These macro conditions placed stress on any subprime auto portfolio, but they do not explain the alleged fraud at Tricolor. The record delinquencies would have increased pressure on a legitimately operated business; for a business allegedly built on double-pledged collateral, the market stress may have accelerated the timeline to collapse.
Lender reassessment. The Tricolor bankruptcy is causing warehouse lenders to reassess risks in subprime auto lending. Jamie Dimon's warning about "cockroaches" reflects concern that Tricolor may not be an isolated incident. Industry reporting noted that First Brands also collapsed around the same time with similar pledging allegations, suggesting potential systemic issues in how warehouse lenders were monitoring collateral.
The broader concern centers on private credit market oversight. Warehouse lending to subprime auto originators involves less regulatory scrutiny than traditional bank lending, and the due diligence performed on collateral pools may have been insufficient to detect double-pledging. JPMorgan's acknowledgment that it was scouring its underwriting processes suggests that even sophisticated institutions may have gaps in their monitoring capabilities.
Collateral verification failures. The alleged fraud raises questions about how banks verified the collateral underlying their warehouse facilities. In a properly functioning warehouse lending arrangement, the lender performs regular audits of the underlying loan files, verifies that pledged collateral exists, and confirms that no other lender has a prior lien on the same assets. The alleged double-pledging at Tricolor suggests these verification processes either were not performed with sufficient rigor or were circumvented through falsified documentation.
Industry experts anticipate tighter controls going forward. Banks extending warehouse lines to subprime auto originators may require more frequent collateral audits, third-party verification of loan files, and cross-referencing of pledged assets against industry databases. The additional compliance burden could increase costs for legitimate originators and reduce capital availability in the subprime segment—potentially limiting vehicle access for the underserved borrowers Tricolor purported to serve.
Implications for private credit. The Tricolor collapse comes at a time of heightened scrutiny of private credit markets more broadly. Traditional banks have pulled back from certain lending categories, creating opportunities for non-bank lenders but also raising questions about risk monitoring in less regulated corners of the financial system. Dimon's comments about lending standards growing "too lax" over the past decade reflect concern that competitive pressure may have led lenders to accept weaker protections than warranted.
For restructuring professionals, Tricolor illustrates the challenges of unwinding a fraud-tainted business. Unlike a distressed company that failed due to operational or market challenges, a fraud case presents unique obstacles: financial statements cannot be relied upon, collateral positions are disputed, and potential avoidance actions against insiders complicate the administration. The Chapter 7 Trustee's lawsuit, filed in December 2025, signals the beginning of what may be years of litigation to pursue recoveries from those responsible for the company's collapse.
Lessons for Lenders and Professionals
The Tricolor collapse offers several lessons for warehouse lenders and restructuring professionals who encounter similar situations:
Due diligence on collateral. The alleged double-pledging at Tricolor suggests that lenders' collateral verification processes were insufficient. For warehouse lenders extending credit against auto loan portfolios, best practices should include regular third-party audits of loan files, cross-referencing pledged assets against UCC filings and industry databases, and verification that no other lender has a competing security interest. The cost of such verification is modest compared to the losses sustained when fraud is not detected.
Red flags in rapid growth. Tricolor's recognition as one of the fastest-growing private companies during 2012–2014 should have prompted additional scrutiny. While rapid growth is often a positive indicator, it can also signal that controls are not keeping pace with volume. Lenders extending credit to fast-growing companies should increase—not relax—their monitoring activities.
Coordination among secured creditors. The multi-lender structure at Tricolor meant that each lender conducted its own due diligence in isolation. A lender who discovered that collateral was also pledged to a competitor might have been reluctant to share that information. Going forward, industry initiatives to share collateral verification data—while navigating antitrust concerns—could help detect double-pledging earlier.
Contingency planning for sudden collapse. Tricolor's overnight shutdown left employees, customers, and creditors scrambling. While the fraud allegations explain the abruptness, lenders should consider how they would respond to a borrower's sudden cessation of operations. Pre-negotiated wind-down plans, access rights to collateral, and relationships with third-party servicers can reduce chaos when the unexpected occurs.
Key Timeline
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| 1992 | Daniel Chu co-founds PAACO Automotive Group |
| 2007 | Tricolor Holdings founded in Irving, Texas |
| 2012–2014 | Company recognized as one of fastest-growing private companies |
| 2018 | Fraud scheme allegedly begins (per indictment) |
| August 2025 | Tricolor has $1.4B real collateral but has pledged $2.2B (per indictment) |
| September 4, 2025 | Operations cease overnight; 1,000+ employees terminated; 60 locations locked |
| September 10, 2025 | Chapter 7 petition filed (Northern District of Texas) |
| September 2025 | Anne Elizabeth Burns appointed Chapter 7 Trustee |
| September 2025 | Fifth Third discloses $170–$200M impairment charge |
| October 2025 | JPMorgan discloses $170M charge-off; Jamie Dimon warns of "cockroaches" |
| October 2025 | Trustee files cash collateral and limited operations motions |
| November 2025 | Trustee files vehicle sale motion for ~10,000 vehicles |
| December 11, 2025 | Trustee files lawsuit related to collapse |
| December 17, 2025 | Daniel Chu and David Goodgame arrested on federal charges |
| December 2025 | Jerome Kollar and Ameryn Seibold plead guilty; cooperating |
| January 31, 2026 | Proceeds Bar Date |
| March 31, 2026 | Vehicle Sales Deadline |
Frequently Asked Questions
Why did Tricolor file for Chapter 7 instead of Chapter 11?
Direct Chapter 7 liquidation is rare for companies of this size. The fraud allegations, complex collateral disputes involving multiple secured creditors with competing claims, and the absence of going-concern value made reorganization impractical. When alleged double-pledging is this pervasive, there is no buyer willing to acquire the platform, and no lender willing to provide DIP financing for a Chapter 11 process.
What was the alleged fraud scheme?
Federal prosecutors allege that Tricolor executives double-pledged collateral—pledging approximately $2.2 billion to lenders while actually possessing only $1.4 billion in real collateral, an $800 million shortfall. The scheme allegedly involved pledging the same auto loans and vehicles to multiple warehouse lenders simultaneously, as well as potentially fabricating some loans entirely.
Who has been charged with crimes?
Founder and CEO Daniel Chu (62) and COO David Goodgame (49) face federal charges including conspiracy, bank fraud, and Continuing Financial Crimes Enterprise. Chu faces up to life in prison if convicted on the kingpin charge. Two other former executives—Jerome Kollar and Ameryn Seibold—pled guilty and are cooperating with prosecutors.
Which banks lost money?
JPMorgan Chase disclosed a $170 million charge-off. Fifth Third Bancorp recorded a $170 to $200 million impairment charge. Barclays and several other lenders also had exposure. Combined disclosed losses from major banks exceed $340 million, though total losses across all lenders may be higher.
What happened to Tricolor's customers?
The abrupt shutdown left approximately 100,000 borrowers uncertain about their loans. Some customers experienced wrongful repossession, and some were left without cars. Vervent Inc. was appointed as the new loan servicer, and borrowers should continue making payments. The Texas DMV investigated 157 complaints, and customers can file additional complaints through state agencies.
How many vehicles are being liquidated?
Approximately 10,000 vehicles spread across roughly 60 retail locations, plus about 100,000 loan accounts. The Chapter 7 Trustee retained Vervent Inc. and Holman for auction services and vehicle disposition.
What did Jamie Dimon say about Tricolor?
Dimon called JPMorgan's Tricolor losses "not our finest moment" and warned: "When you see one cockroach, there's probably more." He said lending standards had grown too lax over the past decade and stated that "there clearly was, in my opinion, fraud involved in a bunch of these things."
Who is the Chapter 7 Trustee?
Anne Elizabeth Burns was appointed to manage the liquidation. She has filed motions for use of cash collateral and authority to sell the vehicle inventory, and filed a lawsuit in December 2025 to pursue recoveries for the estate.
What made Tricolor's business model unusual?
Tricolor served an underserved population that was largely invisible to traditional credit systems: 68% of borrowers had no credit score, 75% were undocumented Hispanic immigrants, and over 50% lacked driver's licenses. The company charged interest rates often exceeding 20% and disbursed over $5 billion in auto loans.
When will the liquidation be complete?
The Vehicle Sales Deadline is March 31, 2026, and the Proceeds Bar Date is January 31, 2026. Given the complexity of liquidating 10,000 vehicles with disputed lien positions across 60 locations while coordinating with multiple secured creditors, the timeline may extend depending on litigation and title resolution issues.
Who is the claims agent for Tricolor Holdings?
Verita Global (Kurtzman Carson Consultants) serves as the claims and noticing agent. The firm maintains the official claims register and distributes case notifications to creditors and parties in interest.
For more bankruptcy analysis and restructuring news, visit the ElevenFlo blog.