Cases
CourtFilingsPetition dateMore filters
The court held the hearing on Birlasoft Solutions Inc.’s post-confirmation enforcement motion and took the matter under advisement, leaving unresolved a live dispute over whether reorganized Invacare and Oracle must honor Oracle cloud-services obligations treated as assumed under the plan. Birlasoft’s underlying motion to enforce the confirmation order and plan asks the court to enforce the plan’s executory-contract assumption provisions and require Invacare and Oracle to perform obligations under the Cloud Services Document; Invacare has opposed the requested enforcement. The May 18 courtroom minutes do not enter a ruling, but they move the dispute from briefing and evidentiary preparation to a submitted post-confirmation enforcement issue. Professionals should track the ruling because it could clarify the scope of assumed technology-contract obligations after emergence and determine whether a reorganized debtor can be compelled to carry forward third-party service commitments embedded in the plan record.
Loading defined terms…