Cases
Cases
Claim Jumper reached liquidation-plan effectiveness, reported in the effective-date notice Dkt. 800 filed November 22, 2011. The operative path is implementation of the confirmed plan, including distributions to holders of allowed general unsecured claims through a GUC Trust under the liquidation plan Dkt. 724.
Claim Jumper's chapter 11 resulted in a confirmed liquidation plan. The confirmation order Dkt. 763 was filed October 5, 2011, and the effective-date notice Dkt. 800 filed November 22, 2011 reported plan effectiveness. The resulting path is liquidation-plan implementation, with distributions to holders of allowed general unsecured claims contemplated through a GUC Trust under the First Amended Joint Plan of Liquidation Dkt. 724.
The debtor filed its chapter 11 petition Dkt. 1 on September 10, 2010. At filing, the business operated 44 full-service casual dining restaurants and employed approximately 5,300 people. CFO William Taves attributed its financial pressure to the economic downturn, reporting same-store sales declines of 12.1% in 2009 and another 6.3% in the first half of 2010 in his first-day declaration Dkt. 16.
The initial restructuring strategy was a competitive sale process. The first-day declaration Dkt. 16 described a stalking-horse agreement with Landry's Restaurants to acquire substantially all assets for a proposed $52 million purchase price, subject to adjustments and competitive bidding. To support operations during the case, the court authorized interim use of cash collateral and granted adequate protection in the interim cash-collateral order Dkt. 55 filed September 13, 2010.
Updated Oct 6
| Week | Filings |
|---|---|
| Week of Sep 6, 2010 | 32 |
| Week of Sep 13, 2010 | 45 |
| Week of Sep 20, 2010 | 30 |
| Week of Sep 27, 2010 | 46 |
| Week of Oct 4, 2010 | 47 |
| Week of Oct 11, 2010 | 17 |
| Week of Oct 18, 2010 | 43 |
| Week of Oct 25, 2010 | 9 |
| Week of Nov 1, 2010 | 20 |
| Week of Nov 8, 2010 | 12 |
| Week of Nov 15, 2010 | 12 |
| Week of Nov 22, 2010 | 7 |
| Week of Nov 29, 2010 | 12 |
| Week of Dec 6, 2010 | 13 |
| Week of Dec 13, 2010 | 8 |
| Week of Dec 20, 2010 | 14 |
| Week of Dec 27, 2010 | 20 |
| Week of Jan 3, 2011 | 3 |
| Week of Jan 10, 2011 | 7 |
| Week of Jan 17, 2011 | 2 |
| Week of Jan 24, 2011 | 2 |
| Week of Jan 31, 2011 | 1 |
| Week of Feb 7, 2011 | 1 |
| Week of Feb 14, 2011 | 3 |
| Week of Feb 21, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Feb 28, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Mar 7, 2011 | 5 |
| Week of Mar 14, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Mar 21, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Mar 28, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Apr 4, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Apr 11, 2011 | 1 |
| Week of Apr 18, 2011 | 1 |
| Week of Apr 25, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of May 2, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of May 9, 2011 | 1 |
| Week of May 16, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of May 23, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of May 30, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Jun 6, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Jun 13, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Jun 20, 2011 | 1 |
| Week of Jun 27, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Jul 4, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Jul 11, 2011 | 1 |
| Week of Jul 18, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Jul 25, 2011 | 1 |
| Week of Aug 1, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Aug 8, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Aug 15, 2011 | 1 |
| Week of Aug 22, 2011 | 3 |
| Week of Aug 29, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Sep 5, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Sep 12, 2011 | 1 |
| Week of Sep 19, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Sep 26, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Oct 3, 2011 | 4 |
| Week of Oct 10, 2011 | 1 |
| Week of Oct 17, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Oct 24, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Oct 31, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Nov 7, 2011 | 2 |
| Week of Nov 14, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Nov 21, 2011 | 1 |
| Week of Nov 28, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Dec 5, 2011 | 1 |
| Week of Dec 12, 2011 | 1 |
| Week of Dec 19, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Dec 26, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Jan 2, 2012 | 1 |
| Week of Jan 9, 2012 | 0 |
| Week of Jan 16, 2012 | 0 |
| Week of Jan 23, 2012 | 0 |
| Week of Jan 30, 2012 | 2 |
| Week of Feb 6, 2012 | 0 |
| Week of Feb 13, 2012 | 0 |
| Week of Feb 20, 2012 | 0 |
| Week of Feb 27, 2012 | 0 |
| Week of Mar 5, 2012 | 2 |
| Week of Mar 12, 2012 | 1 |
Case facts and filing dates come from court records.Case docket on PACER
Claim Jumper reached liquidation-plan effectiveness, reported in the effective-date notice Dkt. 800 filed November 22, 2011. The operative path is implementation of the confirmed plan, including distributions to holders of allowed general unsecured claims through a GUC Trust under the liquidation plan Dkt. 724.
Claim Jumper's chapter 11 resulted in a confirmed liquidation plan. The confirmation order Dkt. 763 was filed October 5, 2011, and the effective-date notice Dkt. 800 filed November 22, 2011 reported plan effectiveness. The resulting path is liquidation-plan implementation, with distributions to holders of allowed general unsecured claims contemplated through a GUC Trust under the First Amended Joint Plan of Liquidation Dkt. 724.
The debtor filed its chapter 11 petition Dkt. 1 on September 10, 2010. At filing, the business operated 44 full-service casual dining restaurants and employed approximately 5,300 people. CFO William Taves attributed its financial pressure to the economic downturn, reporting same-store sales declines of 12.1% in 2009 and another 6.3% in the first half of 2010 in his first-day declaration Dkt. 16.
The initial restructuring strategy was a competitive sale process. The first-day declaration Dkt. 16 described a stalking-horse agreement with Landry's Restaurants to acquire substantially all assets for a proposed $52 million purchase price, subject to adjustments and competitive bidding. To support operations during the case, the court authorized interim use of cash collateral and granted adequate protection in the interim cash-collateral order Dkt. 55 filed September 13, 2010.
Updated Oct 6
| Week | Filings |
|---|---|
| Week of Sep 6, 2010 | 32 |
| Week of Sep 13, 2010 | 45 |
| Week of Sep 20, 2010 | 30 |
| Week of Sep 27, 2010 | 46 |
| Week of Oct 4, 2010 | 47 |
| Week of Oct 11, 2010 | 17 |
| Week of Oct 18, 2010 | 43 |
| Week of Oct 25, 2010 | 9 |
| Week of Nov 1, 2010 | 20 |
| Week of Nov 8, 2010 | 12 |
| Week of Nov 15, 2010 | 12 |
| Week of Nov 22, 2010 | 7 |
| Week of Nov 29, 2010 | 12 |
| Week of Dec 6, 2010 | 13 |
| Week of Dec 13, 2010 | 8 |
| Week of Dec 20, 2010 | 14 |
| Week of Dec 27, 2010 | 20 |
| Week of Jan 3, 2011 | 3 |
| Week of Jan 10, 2011 | 7 |
| Week of Jan 17, 2011 | 2 |
| Week of Jan 24, 2011 | 2 |
| Week of Jan 31, 2011 | 1 |
| Week of Feb 7, 2011 | 1 |
| Week of Feb 14, 2011 | 3 |
| Week of Feb 21, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Feb 28, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Mar 7, 2011 | 5 |
| Week of Mar 14, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Mar 21, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Mar 28, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Apr 4, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Apr 11, 2011 | 1 |
| Week of Apr 18, 2011 | 1 |
| Week of Apr 25, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of May 2, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of May 9, 2011 | 1 |
| Week of May 16, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of May 23, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of May 30, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Jun 6, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Jun 13, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Jun 20, 2011 | 1 |
| Week of Jun 27, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Jul 4, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Jul 11, 2011 | 1 |
| Week of Jul 18, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Jul 25, 2011 | 1 |
| Week of Aug 1, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Aug 8, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Aug 15, 2011 | 1 |
| Week of Aug 22, 2011 | 3 |
| Week of Aug 29, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Sep 5, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Sep 12, 2011 | 1 |
| Week of Sep 19, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Sep 26, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Oct 3, 2011 | 4 |
| Week of Oct 10, 2011 | 1 |
| Week of Oct 17, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Oct 24, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Oct 31, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Nov 7, 2011 | 2 |
| Week of Nov 14, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Nov 21, 2011 | 1 |
| Week of Nov 28, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Dec 5, 2011 | 1 |
| Week of Dec 12, 2011 | 1 |
| Week of Dec 19, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Dec 26, 2011 | 0 |
| Week of Jan 2, 2012 | 1 |
| Week of Jan 9, 2012 | 0 |
| Week of Jan 16, 2012 | 0 |
| Week of Jan 23, 2012 | 0 |
| Week of Jan 30, 2012 | 2 |
| Week of Feb 6, 2012 | 0 |
| Week of Feb 13, 2012 | 0 |
| Week of Feb 20, 2012 | 0 |
| Week of Feb 27, 2012 | 0 |
| Week of Mar 5, 2012 | 2 |
| Week of Mar 12, 2012 | 1 |
Case facts and filing dates come from court records.Case docket on PACER