Clements Electric Texas LLC Bankruptcy Docket

Cases

Developments

Main-docket filings per month since the petition
Month	Filings
October 2024	17
November 2024	26
December 2024	7
January 2025	5
February 2025	10
March 2025	10
April 2025	7
May 2025	3
June 2025	8
July 2025	0
August 2025	0
September 2025	6
October 2025	2
November 2025	10
December 2025	15
January 2026	9
February 2026	14
March 2026	16
April 2026	54
May 2026	60
June 2026	22
July 2026	14
August 2026	31
September 2026	8
October 2026	13
November 2026	1

Recent filings

May 28List (witness/exhibit/generic)Dkt. 244
May 27Notice of hearingDkt. 240
May 27List (witness/exhibit/generic)Dkt. 241
May 27COURT ORDER: Creditor Adriano Kruel Budri has objected to the striking of Dkt. 238 by written correspondence. The Court finds that the Motion was properly stricken by the Clerk of Court. Mr. Budri did not seek prior authorization for the filing. 28 U.S.C. § 455 governs a motion for recusal and disqualification of a sitting judge. Bankruptcy Rule 5004(a) incorporates § 455 and states that § 455 shall govern the disqualification of a bankruptcy judge from a proceeding, contested matter, or case. Fed. R. Bankr. P. 5004. The Fifth Circuit has interpreted this statute to give the judge who is the subject of a motion to recuse or disqualify authority to decide the motion. See U.S. v. Bremers, 195 F.3d 221, 226 (5th Cir. 1999) (finding that a motion to recuse is committed to the discretion of the subject judge). In accordance with Dkt. Nos. 191/207, the proper procedure was to seek leave. Nevertheless, Mr. Budri may urge an oral motion to recuse at the start of the hearing on the Order to Show Cause on June 3, 2026. The Court notes that its earlier orders regarding the format of the hearing remain unchanged. The Court gave Mr. Budri an opportunity to elucidate the nature of his medical issues and financial issues and remains unaware and unconvinced that Mr. Budri, who has filed or sought to file dozens of duplicative pleadings, and sent dozens more pieces of correspondence, cannot appear in person or by video to address his filings. It is well within the discretion of the Court to dictate the mode of appearance of parties. (RE: related document(s)238 STRICKEN in accordance with the order at Docket No. 207 as not having been authorized by the court before filing - Motion to recuse Judge Larson Filed by Creditor Adriano Kruel Budri. (Okafor, M.))Dkt. 239
May 26Notice of approval of expedited hearing requestFiling
May 26NOTICE OF DENIAL OF MOTION FOR EXPEDITED HEARING. The motion for expedited hearing has been DENIED by the court. Counsel for movant shall promptly file and serve a notice of hearing in ECF setting the Motion for Contempt on full notice. (RE: related document(s)237 Motion to shorten time to Notice (RE: related document(s)236 Motion for Contempt)Filing

Case facts and filing dates come from court records.Case docket on PACER

Developments

Main-docket filings per month since the petition
Month	Filings
October 2024	17
November 2024	26
December 2024	7
January 2025	5
February 2025	10
March 2025	10
April 2025	7
May 2025	3
June 2025	8
July 2025	0
August 2025	0
September 2025	6
October 2025	2
November 2025	10
December 2025	15
January 2026	9
February 2026	14
March 2026	16
April 2026	54
May 2026	60
June 2026	22
July 2026	14
August 2026	31
September 2026	8
October 2026	13
November 2026	1

Recent filings

May 28List (witness/exhibit/generic)Dkt. 244
May 27Notice of hearingDkt. 240
May 27List (witness/exhibit/generic)Dkt. 241
May 27COURT ORDER: Creditor Adriano Kruel Budri has objected to the striking of Dkt. 238 by written correspondence. The Court finds that the Motion was properly stricken by the Clerk of Court. Mr. Budri did not seek prior authorization for the filing. 28 U.S.C. § 455 governs a motion for recusal and disqualification of a sitting judge. Bankruptcy Rule 5004(a) incorporates § 455 and states that § 455 shall govern the disqualification of a bankruptcy judge from a proceeding, contested matter, or case. Fed. R. Bankr. P. 5004. The Fifth Circuit has interpreted this statute to give the judge who is the subject of a motion to recuse or disqualify authority to decide the motion. See U.S. v. Bremers, 195 F.3d 221, 226 (5th Cir. 1999) (finding that a motion to recuse is committed to the discretion of the subject judge). In accordance with Dkt. Nos. 191/207, the proper procedure was to seek leave. Nevertheless, Mr. Budri may urge an oral motion to recuse at the start of the hearing on the Order to Show Cause on June 3, 2026. The Court notes that its earlier orders regarding the format of the hearing remain unchanged. The Court gave Mr. Budri an opportunity to elucidate the nature of his medical issues and financial issues and remains unaware and unconvinced that Mr. Budri, who has filed or sought to file dozens of duplicative pleadings, and sent dozens more pieces of correspondence, cannot appear in person or by video to address his filings. It is well within the discretion of the Court to dictate the mode of appearance of parties. (RE: related document(s)238 STRICKEN in accordance with the order at Docket No. 207 as not having been authorized by the court before filing - Motion to recuse Judge Larson Filed by Creditor Adriano Kruel Budri. (Okafor, M.))Dkt. 239
May 26Notice of approval of expedited hearing requestFiling
May 26NOTICE OF DENIAL OF MOTION FOR EXPEDITED HEARING. The motion for expedited hearing has been DENIED by the court. Counsel for movant shall promptly file and serve a notice of hearing in ECF setting the Motion for Contempt on full notice. (RE: related document(s)237 Motion to shorten time to Notice (RE: related document(s)236 Motion for Contempt)Filing

Case facts and filing dates come from court records.Case docket on PACER

Clements Electric Texas LLC

Clements Electric Texas LLC

Clements Electric Texas LLC

Clements Electric Texas LLC

Developments

Docket filings per month

Recent filings

Developments

Docket filings per month

Recent filings

Developments

Docket filings per month

Recent filings